Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes - MSW Program


The report below is based on the Council on Social Work Education (CSWE) 2022 Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards (EPAS).

Commission on Accreditation (COA)
Department of Social Work Accreditation (DOSWA)
Baccalaureate and Master’s Social Work Program Accreditation

2022 EPAS
Form AS M5.0.1(d) | Public Reporting of Assessment Outcomes

MSW Program, School of Social Welfare, University of Kansas
Webpage last updated on June 29, 2023

Generalist Practice | Summary of Plan

MSW Generalist Practice | Summary of Plan
CompetencyInstrumentInstrument: Expected Level of AchievementCompetency: Expected Level of Achievement for Competency
Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional BehaviorInstrument 1: Generalist Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Ethical Dilemma Case Study (SW 710)Average score of 3.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 0 to 4.
Competency 2: Advance Human Rights and Social, Racial, Economic, and Environmental JusticeInstrument 1: Generalist Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Solidarity Action Project (SW 708)Average score of 3.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 0 to 4.
Competency 3: Engage Anti-Racism, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (ADEI) in PracticeInstrument 1: Generalist Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Social Justice Arts Collective (SW 755)Average score of 3.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 0 to 4.
Competency 4: Engage in Practice-informed Research and Research-informed PracticeInstrument 1: Generalist Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Research–informed Practice Paper (SW 740)Average score of 3.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 0 to 4.
Competency 5: Engage in Policy PracticeInstrument 1: Generalist Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%

Instrument 2: Policy Brief (SW 720)

Average score of 3.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 0 to 4.
Competency 6: Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and CommunitiesInstrument 1: Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%

Instrument 2: Telehealth Role Play – Engagement with an Individual (SW 710)

Average score of 3.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 0 to 4.
Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and CommunitiesInstrument 1: Generalist Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Organizational Assessment (SW 710)Average score of 3.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 0 to 4.
Competency 8: Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and CommunitiesInstrument 1: Generalist Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Engaging in Community Change Strategies (SW 711)Average score of 3.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 0 to 4.
Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and CommunitiesInstrument 1: Generalist Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Tracking Your Professional Growth (SW 711)Average score of 3.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 0 to 4.

 


Generalist Practice | Summary of Outcomes

Assessment Data Collected on: 05/23

Generalist Practice | Summary of Outcomes
CompetencyCompetency: Expected Level of Achievement Inclusive of All InstrumentsAggregate Actual Outcomes: All Program Options
(n=73)
Program Option 1 Outcomes: Lawrence
(n=31)
Program Option 2 Outcomes: Edwards
(n=42)
Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior80%93%100%88%
Competency 2: Advance Human Rights and Social, Racial, Economic, and Environmental Justice80%93%100%88%
Competency 3: Engage Anti-Racism, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (ADEI) in Practice80%90%83%95%
Competency 4: Engage in Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice80%84%90%81%
Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice80%86%91%82%
Competency 6: Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities80%91%97%88%
Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities80%92%98%87%
Competency 8: Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities80%95%97%94%
Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities80%93%97%91%

 




Specialized Practice | Summary of Plan

Area of Specialized Practice: Clinical Practice

Specialized Practice | Summary of Plan - Clinical Practice
CompetencyInstrumentInstrument: Expected Level of AchievementCompetency: Expected Level of Achievement for Competency
Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional BehaviorInstrument 1: Clinical Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Case Presentation (SW 885)3 or higher on a scale from 0 to 4
Competency 2: Advance Human Rights and Social, Racial, Economic, and Environmental JusticeInstrument 1: Clinical Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Case Presentation (SW 885)3 or higher on a scale from 0 to 4
Competency 3: Engage Anti-Racism, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (ADEI) in PracticeInstrument 1: Clinical Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Clinical Case Formulation (SW 811)3 or higher on a scale from 0 to 4
Competency 4: Engage in Practice-informed Research and Research-informed PracticeInstrument 1: Clinical Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Independent Learning Project & Reflective Paper (SW 885)3 or higher on a scale from 0 to 4
Competency 5: Engage in Policy PracticeInstrument 1: Clinical Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Clinical Case Formulation (SW 811)3 or higher on a scale from 0 to 4
Competency 6: Engage with Individuals, Families, and GroupsInstrument 1: Clinical Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Clinical Engagement Role Play (SW 810)3 or higher on a scale from 0 to 4
Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, and GroupsInstrument 1: Clinical Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Biopsychosocial Assessment-Diagnostic Case Study (SW 863)3 or higher on a scale from 0 to 4
Competency 8: Intervene with Individuals, Families, and GroupsInstrument 1: Clinical Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Clinical Case Formulation (SW 811)3 or higher on a scale from 0 to 4

Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, and Groups

Instrument 1: Clinical Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Clinical Case Formulation (SW 811)3 or higher on a scale from 0 to 4

 


Specialized Practice | Summary of Outcomes

Area of Specialized Practice: Clinical Practice

Assessment Data Collected on: 05/23

Specialized Practice | Summary of Outcomes - Clinical Practice
CompetencyCompetency: Expected Level of Achievement Inclusive of All InstrumentsAggregate Actual Outcomes: All Program Options
(n=164)
Program Option 1 Outcomes: Lawrence
(n=57)
Program Option 2 Outcomes: Edwards
(n=88)
Program Option 3 Outcomes: Pittsburg
(n=19)
Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior80%99%99%99%100%
Competency 2: Advance Human Rights and Social, Racial, Economic, and Environmental Justice80%98%99%99%100%
Competency 3: Engage Anti-Racism, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (ADEI) in Practice80%94%98%92%98%
Competency 4: Engage in Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice80%97%99%98%95%
Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice80%94%99%91%95%
Competency 6: Engage with Individuals, Families, and Groups80%96%98%95%90%
Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, and Groups80%95%91%96%100%
Competency 8: Intervene with Individuals, Families, and Groups80%95%99%93%90%
Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, and Groups80%92%99%88%98%

 




Specialized Practice | Summary of Plan

Area of Specialized Practice: Macro Practice

Specialized Practice | Summary of Plan - Macro Practice
CompetencyInstrumentInstrument: Expected Level of AchievementCompetency: Expected Level of Achievement
Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional BehaviorInstrument 1: Macro Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Leadership Vision (SW 843)3 or higher on a scale from 0 to 4
Competency 2: Advance Human Rights and Social, Racial, Economic, and Environmental JusticeInstrument 1: Macro Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Social Problem Analysis + Application of Advanced Policy Analysis Framework (SW 841)3 or higher on a scale from 0 to 4
Competency 3: Engage Anti-Racism, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (ADEI) in PracticeInstrument 1: Macro Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Problem Statement & Population Analysis (SW 840)3 or higher on a scale from 0 to 4
Competency 4: Engage in Practice-informed Research and Research-informed PracticeInstrument 1: Macro Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Presentation of Evidence (SW 840)3 or higher on a scale from 0 to 4
Competency 5: Engage in Policy PracticeInstrument 1: Macro Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Policy Briefing (SW 841)3 or higher on a scale from 0 to 4
Competency 6: Engage with Organizations and CommunitiesInstrument 1: Macro Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Advocacy Message Box (SW 846)3 or higher on a scale from 0 to 4
Competency 7: Assess Organizations and CommunitiesInstrument 1: Macro Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Social Problem Analysis + Application of Advanced Policy Analysis Framework (SW 841)3 or higher on a scale from 0 to 4
Competency 8: Intervene with Organizations and CommunitiesInstrument 1: Macro Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Power Analysis (SW 846)3 or higher on a scale from 0 to 4
Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Organizations and CommunitiesInstrument 1: Macro Practicum EvaluationAverage score of 4.0 or higher across all criterion, rated on a scale from 1 to 5.80%
Instrument 2: Summary Evaluation Plan & Key Measures (SW 842)3 or higher on a scale from 0 to 4

 


Specialized Practice | Summary of Outcomes

Area of Specialized Practice: Macro Practice

Assessment Data Collected on: 05/23

Specialized Practice | Summary of Outcomes - Macro Practice
CompetencyCompetency: Expected Level of Achievement Inclusive of All InstrumentsAggregate Actual Outcomes: All Program Options
(n=14)
Program Option 1 Outcomes: Lawrence
(n=5)
Program Option 2 Outcomes: Edwards
(n=9)
Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior80%100%100%100%
Competency 2: Advance Human Rights and Social, Racial, Economic, and Environmental Justice80%92%100%86%
Competency 3: Engage Anti-Racism, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (ADEI) in Practice80%96%100%93%
Competency 4: Engage in Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice80%100%100%100%
Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice80%92%100%86%
Competency 6: Engage with Organizations and Communities80%75%91%62%
Competency 7: Assess Organizations and Communities80%84%100%69%
Competency 8: Intervene with Organizations and Communities80%87%100%57%
Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Organizations and Communities80%100%100%100%